change' is bound to be contested, as Kanbur states,
because 'there is no uniform or unique answer' [34].
Views that may be prevalent in one part of the devel-
opment community are not necessarily shared by other
parts of that community, or in society more widely.
Until fairly recently great reliance was placed on
GNP per capita as a convenient index of development.
It was useful as a compact indicator to policy makers
and provided a quantifiable measure for economists
who were able to monitor its fluctuations and analyze
changes due to movements in sectoral output, factor
shares or categories of expenditure. Yet, experience
has shown that increases in national income do not
necessarily lead to the solution of social, economic and
political problems. They remain, perhaps emerging in
different forms and changing their dimension in
countries with rising per capita income. Indeed, not
only does economic growth often fail to resolve social,
economic and political difficulties, certain types of
inappropriate growth may actually initiate and promote
them. It should be recognized that we cannot avoid
making value judgements when it comes to defining a
more comprehensive index of development. But whose
value judgements are to be accepted? One approach
would be to copy the path of industrial countries, but
which of the currently rich and developed countries
appear as really desirable models? Some Western
countries with seemingly high incomes cannot be
recommended, owing to the damage to the ozone
layer from the release of industrial gases into the
atmosphere and the likely consequences through
global warming for all of us, particularly in the Pacific.
The widespread exposure to the modern diseases of
cancer, coronary heart disease and other health
problems related to high intakes of artificial foodstuffs,
over-reliance on politically unstable countries for stra-
tegic raw materials (e.g. oil), which often contributes to
internal crisis stemming from theses unstable countries,
with a spiralling effect on other regions surrounding
them, are all pointers to the imperfect nature of their
developmental models [35].
For a region to be termed developed, certain
conditions should be attained by its citizens, to be
precise, enough food and other basic goods and
services, (human beings are required to consume a
certain amount of calories per day), minimum levels
of clothing, footwear and shelter, etc. The failure of a
state to attain such an income level which allows the
consumption of the minimum nutritionally determined
level of food intake would warrant its citizens to be
considered destitute and in absolute poverty. Another
basic necessity, and a precondition for gaining enough
income to rise above the poverty line, is access to a
job or some form of employment, which may entail
formal paid employment, unpaid work on a family
farm or in a family business, or caring for children and
members of the household i.e. unpaid household
work. The lack of an income-generating opportunity
implies labor market inactivity and unemployment,
and may lead to poverty. Even when a country realizes
a high rate of economic growth, it may fail to reduce
poverty and underemployment, since the growth pro-
cess it is following (e.g. urban-based, import-depen-
dent industrialization) is leaving the majority of the
population untouched. Meanwhile, in some parts of
Asia and the Pacific, Latin America and in sub-Saharan
Africa, because population growth rates are so high,
rates of economic growth and employment creation
would need to be unprecedented to prevent rising
numbers of households falling into poverty. In many
Pacific island countries population growth rates exceed
the recently attained rate of economic growth, and many
households fail to realize any income growth [35].
The obvious direct link between per capita income
and the numbers living in poverty is via the distri-
bution of income. Clearly, poverty will be reduced
much more rapidly where the fruits of economic
growth are accompanied by their more equal distri-
bution, yet, some would argue that equality should be
considered a development objective in its own right,
and that large scale inequality and massive poverty
are objectionable by any religious or ethical consid-
eration. Who could possibly defend the continuance of
the existing situation whereby the average American
is 117 times richer (in income terms) than the average
African? Yet, the true fulfillment of human potential
requires more than the above. In addition, a range of
levels of basic needs, encompassed under the
umbrella term 'social indicators,' need to be satis-
factorily provided. They include adequate levels of
education (especially literacy and numeracy), food
security and nutrition (particularly of young children),
mortality, life expectancy and morbidity, and access to
a whole range of social services such as health, safe
water, sanitation, transportation and housing. In ad-
dition, development requires a breakdown of tradi-
tional sex roles so that women can also realize their
full human potential and gain the ability to freely de-
termine—through access to family planning services—
the number of children to which they give birth [35].
Furthermore, he stressed that dissatisfaction with
GNP as an indicator of development has led to an
interest in alternative indices of the 'quality of life.' A
'Physical Quality of Life Index' (PQLI) is usually
composed of a composite of three indicators: life ex-
pectancy, infant mortality, and literacy. It is often
presented as a measure of how effectively various
development strategies distribute the benefits of prog-
ress to the various component parts of society. The
latest version of a PQLI is that of the United Nations
Development Programme (UNDP) which was unveiled
in 1990 and has brought into existence 'human
development' and more recently 'sustainable devel-
opment.' It argues that 'human development is a
process of enlarging people's choices.' These critical
choices concern a long and healthy life, education and
access to scarce resources [14–35].
In recent times, 'development' has been explained
51